One of the reason why I quit Google and moved to Canada is because of Poutine. It is serious!

In 2006, I lived in Montreal to study French at University of Montreal and I discovered one of my favorite food: Poutine. It is a very simple food. In a big bowl, you add French fries, chicken based gravy sauce and some fresh mozzarella cheese on top. That’s the basic Poutine. I love it.

Now, I discovered that there is a restaurant in Montreal that has a very special Poutine. It’s a Poutine with Fois Gras!

I couldn’t resist it and I went there on Thursday. Au Pied de Cochon is a restaurant specialized in Fois Gras and the place is really comfy and invites people to eat seriously.

I went there and I ordered Poutine avec Fois Gras. I also ordered a special beer from the restaurant, I think it was biére de Pied de Cochon Rousse. It was a nice mix of red beer and poutine. The fois gras came in a generous size. It was mid-rare. I expected the fois gras to be more cooked so it would enable the fat from the fois gras to come stronger.

It was a nice experience for a poutine lover. Do you love poutine?

Restaurant Au Pied de Cochon

536, rue Duluth Est, Montréal, QC
H2L 1A9

514-281-1114

www.restaurantaupieddecochon.ca
Open 5PM till 12AM (close on Mondays)
View Larger Map

I met with Peter from DailyDinner.tv and I was delighted to hear about his entrepreneurial story. He did not have any previous experience in programming, video editing nor starting up a business, but he is an example of a true entrepreneur who is self-reliant and self-learner that can exceed anyone’s expectation.

I checked his website about recipes for dinners and I am impressed by the quality of the recipes, videos, structure of the website and one interface innovation. Don’t be fool to judge the simple design of the website. The site is useful, loads quickly and that’s what a user wants nowadays.

Serving calculator

I visited other recipes and they do have similar features, but they are slow and confusing. Here, you just have to check for the appropriate amount and the AJAX magic updates the page without having to reload the whole pages (other websites reloads the whole page and it’s a hassle).

The website has hundreds of recipes and the only thing that I wish was that the organization of the recipes could be better. Maybe a directory of the recipes would help in this case.

http://vimeo.com/channels/ent101

MaRS offers a complete set of videos that provides business 101 to those who want to create a startup. The videos are pretty straight forward and the speakers are experienced entrepreneurs or people in the industry who provides great insights and share experiences.

Kwedit is a strange name for a payment company. This is a startup that offers a new form of payment to social and interactive games that allows people to buy virtual goods. The strange thing is that it allows people to “promise” to pay for a virtual good and the user can pay the promise later with a bar code in a 7eleven store.

Even though this seems to be a great innovation, the idea of printing a bar code and pay it in a retail store is nothing new to date. The strong differentiator of Kwedit is the idea of promising to pay later. I wonder what would happen if everybody promises to pay but none of the actually pays anything. I believe that the CFO of the company would be scare of the increase in the account payable of the balance sheet.

This type of payment for virtual goods reminded me of Habbo Hotel. Habbo is a Finnish company that started its virtual goods operations before the internet boom. It is probably the first company to have a business model based on selling virtual goodies to users. Interesting enough, Habbo targeted in a very narrow market segment. Its targets on teenagers that love to chat in pixel-lated environment.

Habbo and its many forms of payments.

Habbo offers 7eleven payments too. OK, they sell pre-paid cards and Kwedit doesn’t.

In my humble opinion, Sulake could have grown much more if it had focused on the virtual good market as a whole market instead of just that niche teenager segment. It could have created a strategic plan of reaching all types of games and services based on virtual goods. Well, other companies grew upon this model and they are newer than Habbo. C’est tant pis.

CrowdFlower is a company that allows companies to outsource their repetitive tasks such as data verification and filtering. I think initially this can be very useful for internet companies that need to have content verification and data check services. Usually, it is not cheap to hire people to do this kind of job and the error rate is quite high for this type of repetitive task. I think the value proposition is to offer this type of service where companies do not have to hire people and have higher quality of service. It is a promising service.

The company received an additional of $5 million funding as stated from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/crowdflower-raises-five-million-to-boost-crowdsourcing/.

I found out a quality of life index of over 100 countries. Canada is positioned at 11th together with other 8 countries.

Quality of Life Index 2009

Read more here.

The smartphone industry is moving to follow the same path of the personal computer (PC). Both industries have a lot of manufacturers. For example, Dell for computers and Motorola for smartphone. PC and smartphones have operating systems. For PC, the major OS is Windows and for smartphone, there are more than one major operating system. There are iPhone OS, Blackberry and Android (Google). It seems that there is a platform war among the manufacturers and Google. Imagine that a company can implement a system that is used by most of the cellphone manufacturers. This company will be able to control the smartphone industry, just as Microsoft controls the PC industry.

Nexus One Homepage

Google launched its official cellphone with Android operating system today. It is entering the smartphone market by providing a free OS to cellphone and aligning with manufacturer to provide a better user experience through better applications and superior hardware.

Google may reach a dominance in the smartphone market if it can have more manufacturers using its OS. However, manufacturers are not going to rely 100% in one software company. At the same time, most industry players do not have core competency in software development, thus they may rely on Google Android this time.

Meanwhile, iPhone is growing and Blackberry is responding to the new threats in the market. Nokia and other cellphones company are losing ground. It is an interesting time for this fast changing industry.

My 2 cents.

Very very interesting way to see history, politics and graphics.

These guys are great in doing info visual stuff.

http://www.blog.biggerpicture.dk/our-history-visualized/

Spudaroo.com

Spudaroo.com is a website that allows people to pay 3rd parties to create website documents, business plan, blog content, slide presentation, and even resume for lazy people. This is a Canadian startup and I wonder how effective is to outsource this type of work to others. I can’t imagine someone who doesn’t know me to write up my resume. Even worse, it is not a great idea to ask someone else to write a business plan for you if that other person doesn’t know the business or the industry at all.

Lastly, I think the name is really hard to spell and search on Google. Though, it is creative.

The Science of Managing Search Ads

There is an amazing article about Google AdWords from the New York Times.

It illustrates the management of an online campaign in AdWords for a company called Tiny Prints. This company advertisers on Google and gets a substantial part of its revenue and customers from AdWords. The company has stopped advertising for a day, trying to decrease its acquisition cost, but it ended up losing customers and allowing competitors to grow. Its management team decided to advertise again and it started to manage its campaign more closely, balancing the ads spending, competitors’ bids and profits.

The article gives an accurate view of how advertisers live with AdWords. To have success in that platform, you need to have quick decision, money and knowledge to use this powerful tool.

Read more here: The Science of Managing Search Ads

http://tinychat.com/

Tinychat provides free video and audio chatroom for the mass. People can use this tool as a DJ room, virtual meeting presentation room or live interactive TV. I like this website because it’s free and for startups, this tool can connect our team member even if they are in different parts of the world. I think this is a Webex competitor only that Webex is focused on corporate customers and Tinychat is focused on the consumer customers.

If this service catches on, it would be a great acquisition target for big companies like Cisco, Google, Microsoft and even Yahoo. I believe that with the adoption of higher speed internet network and the integration of video and audio into gadgets, the reality is that people will prefer to use video and audio to communicate rather than writing, SMS or IM.

This is a special blog post dedicated to Brazil’s venture capital firms.

Before getting into the list, I want to make it clear that private equity investments are much stronger than venture capital investments. There may be four reasons for a small venture capital market in Brazil:

High interest rate – competition for capital, government bonds are much safer and provide better return, the current real interest rate is over 8%.

Entrepreneur unwilling to exchange equity for capital – the idea of having a 3rd party controlling or on the verge of controlling someone’s company is not very common yet.

Venture capital is unknown – the word venture capital is not a very known word in Portuguese, some people call venture capital as Capital Empreendedor or Capital de Risco in Portuguese. A literal translation of those two words is  entrepreneur capital or risk capital respectively (capital risque in French and riskkapital in Swedish). The meaning of risk is too explicit in those words.

Capital competition from other source of funding – there are big private equity firms and very wealthy individuals that can take the risk of new ventures easily, the capital is highly concentrated.

Sao Paulo - Copan

That is why there are not many venture capital firms that have look and feel of a American or Canadian venture capital firm in Brazil.

Here are some of them:

Monashees Capital + – currently with 7 portfolio presented to the public, Monashees is one of the two firms that fit into the typical venture capital firm (early stage investment, nurturing startups).

Adrenax Capital – this is new for me. It is dedicated to early stage and high-tech investments. This is the second firm that fits into the definition of a typical venture capital firm.

FIR Capital – a hybrid of venture capital and private equity firm, linked to DFJ.

Ideiasnet – This is a hybrid of incubator and venture capital firm.

Rio Bravo - imagine Goldman Sachs + Carlyle + Sequoia in one single firm.

Green Capital – private equity in green tech. Green tech is usually related to agro and ethanol industries in Brazil.

Invest Tech – a fund that invests in technology firms.

DGF Investimentos – it is a venture capital and investment fund firm.

Brazil is such a big country and I am puzzled to see that the venture capital industry is still so small. If the Brazil’s economy continues to rise, maybe there will be market space for more venture capital firms. Also, Brazilian people are known to be very creative and talented. There is no lack of talents for development of new technology and companies.

Lastly, most of the venture and investment firms are located in Sao Paulo. If you are interested in investing in Brazil, this is your city.

If you have any interest to know more about current condition of investing in Brazil, please drop a comment and I will post more things about it.

Times Skimmer

I was reading this news Google Faces A Different World in Italy from the New York Times and it is about Google’s criminal charges related to privacy in Italy. A senior executive in Italy may get to jail because of an outcry over an online video involving an autistic boy.

The implication if Google loses is that opens the discussion of who should be liable for information in the internet platforms, such as YouTube and even Google Search, in Europe. In the US, most of this discussions were solved by the Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act that creates a safe harbor for online service providers. Basically, people can only sue internet companies if it’s proven that the company hasn’t  done anything to stop the offence (copyright or other legal offences). I’m impressed that Europe does not have such laws protecting online service providers yet.

It reminds me of a similar situation when the Google Brasil’s managing director was being held accountable for pedophile pictures on Orkut. Google Brasil and US created huge task-force to curb the infestation of that problem with people and new tools for the federal police. The initiative went really well and the government abandoned the charges. However, there is still no laws defining clearly what the responsibilities are for online service providers regarding about illegal or offensive material in their websites in Brazil.

I’m worried if governments start demanding companies to act as a censor for information flow. The cornerstone of Internet as we know is sharing information. When companies and government start blocking access to information, the internet will not be the same. Consequently, the way we use and do business on the Internet may also change.

I am very impressed and glad by the speed that Stribe has replied to my post. A good entrepreneur should be able to react to the current dynamics of how people comment and make opinions about his product. A fast reply like that is a plus. He got me from this positive attitude.

I registered for the beta and I will check it out and compare with other similar tools from the web. I will update my findings in another blog post once I tested them all.

Below is the reply from Kamel, the CEO of Stribe.

———————————————————–

Hello Chim Kan,

Thanks for sharing. it’s very interesting to have your point of view. I am going to try to show you the key differences between Stribe, Facebook Connect and Google Friend Connect :
- Stribe is an embeddable White Social Network. That means the social network can be fully branded with look & feel of the website;
- Stribe is a B to B service. The ownership of data and content generated by the users of the community is the ownership of the “Stribed” website.
- Stribe provides the analytic of the social activity of the community to let the website drives and understand their members online;
-There is no downloading neither technical requirement to stribe a website. Indeed, you just a Javascript code let you embed a Stribe Social Network. All Internet users will be able to see/join/share with your community IN your website without downloading anything.

Finally, the speed of the website is not impacted by the Stribe Social Network because it is loaded only if the end-user want to interact or engage with the community.

What do you think about these explanations? it is helpful to better undersdand our value proposition?
Feel free to contact me to move forward.

Thanks again for sharing.

All the Best,

Kamel
@stribe

——————————————————————————–

Share and Enjoy:

]]> http://www.chimkan.com/2009/12/13/stribe-fast-response-to-my-previous-post-about-its-product/feed/ 1 http://www.chimkan.com/2009/12/12/stribe-the-top-startup-from-le-web-2009/ http://www.chimkan.com/2009/12/12/stribe-the-top-startup-from-le-web-2009/#comments Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:45:37 +0000 Chim http://www.chimkan.com/?p=834

http://www.stribe.com/

People from the Le Web 2009 in France was making such a fuss for Stribe. Stribe is a company puts a social network bar in your website. Basically, people who are signed in to the Stribe network will be able to have social network experience in websites that installed their Stribe social bar.

http://developers.facebook.com/connect.php

http://www.google.com/friendconnect

Honestly, this is similar to what Facebook and Google Friend connect already provide. These services allow publishers or website owners to know who the visitors are by asking users to sign-in using their Google or Facebook account. Then, the FB or Google Friend Connect bar can link people who are visiting that website and provide guestbook and comment tools to the publishers.

I don’t know what the differentiations from Stribe, FB Connect and Google Friends Connect are.

Plus, when you install these bars, your website gets slower because the user has to load the extra bar in your website. I do not advise installing this for now. Check my new post: http://www.chimkan.com/2009/12/13/stribe-fast-response-to-my-previous-post-about-its-product/

I was using Hunch this weekend to see how it works. It is a quiz guessing website. You make questions and it gives you its hunch about what the best thing is for you.

I chose the What’s the best profession for me quiz. It started showing me the following questions:

And I’ve got the results here.

Internet Speed and Costs Around the World

I wonder what people in each of the high Internet speed market do.

This is a very interesting and basic book about Venture Capital industry. It does inform you some tips about what kind of skills and career path that you should take before joining in. Also, it provides and introductory level of terms and vocabulary for you to get used to before trying to get in a VC firm.

I do not recommend just to read this book alone as a way to have a strong idea of the industry. You should read a lot of other materials spread all over the Internet so you can really have a better idea if you really do want to invest your time and money into the career of a VC.

The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures

I read this book and it is really great to show a new way of structure problem solving framework.

It provides a a good introduction about the benefits of the visual thinking. Then, it provides a step-by-step walkthrough about how to detect, solve and show problems through the use of our visual faculties.

It first shows us how we can enhance our ability to see critically by looking, seeing, imagining and showing. Then, it provides the SQVID method of analytical thinking. It helps our right-side of the brain to be better connected to the left-side. So, we can draw and think at the same time. Moreover, it provides the [6][6] framework that helps us to problem solving.

The book is very easy to read, but it does not lack anything from its simplicity. It provides a complete framework solution for business issues and it’s a great book for those who wants to see creative ways of problem solving.

I would also recommend this book for those who loves TUFTE. Tufte’s books give guidelines of what is good or not in the information design knowledge. The Back of the Napkin provides the how to create amazing graphics and pictures of our problems.

TiE Young Entrepreneurs

I love this competition. It is one of the firsts business competition towards students from 9-12. This business plan is hosted by Carolinas – The Global Network of Entrepreneurs and the award for the winning team is USD 10K.

It is important to foster this type of competitions to children and teens. They will be able to learn and train their guts about the process of creating a new business.

For more information check it here.

Canada - USA - Niagara Falls

People in the venture capital industry know that the VC industry is not going well in Canada. That is why it is even more important to know the situation in a quatitative point of view.

The SME Financing Data Initiative is a government website that publishes quarterly reports about the venture capital industry in Canada. The summary is that the level of investment and funding is the lowest since 2003.

VC investment and fundraising, Q1 2008 and Q1 2009

There is an increase in the number of investment in the seed stage startups. However, all other stages of deals fell.

VC investment by stage of development, Q1 2008 and Q1

Also, you can see better how the distribution deals in Canada per provinces is.

Number of companies receiving VC by province, Q1 2008 and Q1 2009

I haven’t added all the number, but the impression that I have is that the venture capital activities in Canada is decreasing significantly. You can read the whole report here: http://www.sme-fdi.gc.ca/eic/site/sme_fdi-prf_pme.nsf/eng/h_02156.html

I took the report from the Money Tree Report from PriceWaterHouseCoopers and there is a lot of interesting results.

According to the report, the number of deals remained flat but the value increased slightly compared to Q1. But if we compared to Q2 2008, the value of investment drop 48.6%. In this perspective, Canada is not doing that bad at all.

Number of deals in US

Another interesting fact is that the number of seed stage investment increased as in Canada.

Seed investing increasing

This is actually good news. The more we invest in early stage company, the more growth we can expect in 3 – 5 years. So, those who want to gain fast money should not get into the venture capital industry now. But, it is important to get into this industry now to invest in new companies and expect a good exit in 3-5 years; this is the average needed time for a company to mature for an IPO.

The current situation in the VC industry is not good. But, actually, this is a good opportunity to have a readjustment in the industry, lower the valuations and we may have a better return from the portfolio companies in the next 3 -5 years.

I’ve just read news from Revista Exame, a prestigious Brazilian weekly magazine, which talks about the new generation of entrepreneurs in Brazil. According to it, there are 10 million of Brazilian entrepreneurs and the new generation of entrepreneurs are creating companies because they believe they have the skills and will to do it. Compared to the older generation, a lot of self-described entrepreneurs had to open a company because they were not able to get into the job market.

10 million of entrepreneurs in Brazil

Then I went to the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor website and I downloaded the GEM 2008 report. It is a comprehensive survey about entrepreneurs in 43 countries. It separates these countries in 3 categories: Factor-Driven Economies (economies that depend on natural resources mainly), Efficiency-Driven Economies (economies that rely on the economy of scale or comparative advantage in production) and Innovation-Driven Economies (economies that rely on the invention of new technology).

There are some interesting data.

For instance, it seems that the less developed the country, the stronger entrepreneurial activity in that country.

Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity Rates and Per Capita GDP, 2008

Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity Rates by Gender, 2008

However, the entrepreneurial activity in Technology sector is stronger in more developed countries such as Canada. Although the GEM report doesn’t explain why this happens, it is intuitive to know that the development of high technology needs a strong education system in the country. That is why that you can see that countries such as Australia, Ireland, Denmark and Canada have the strongest entrepreneurial index in the Technology sector.

Percentage of Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity Active in Technology Sector, 2002-2008

The Ex Post Facto blog commented about a report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research August 2009 about the percentage of total computer-related employment in companies with fewer than 100 employees. It is interesting to see United States in the bottom of the graph. You can find that Italy, New Zealand and Austria have more small companies in the computer-related services than the US.

Ex Post Facto - Entrepreneurs in the US

Definitely, this doesn’t mean that United States lag behind in the entrepreneurial activity. It is totally the opposite. United States have the Silicon Valley.

All these data do not account other many particularities for the US entrepreneurs. Even though the US main not be in the top position for any entrepreneurial index, it does have a strong entrepreneurial culture and environment.

In my experience, there are some strong cultural traits that you can only see in the Silicon Valley:

-          Belief that one can get rich by starting up a new Google or Apple.

-          Low opportunity cost for entrepreneurs.

-          An unusually high concentration of venture capitalists per square foot in the region.

-          A lot of stories of very successful entrepreneurs.

-          Great universities and culture for innovation.

-          Local culture that see failure as a good thing instead of a bad thing.

-          Also, a lot of young people want to follow the entrepreneurship path, instead of going for the traditional and stable way of life/ career (medicine, lawyer, corporate life, etc.)

In comparison to Brazil, most university students and young people don’t have the same type of culture or thinking. Maybe, there is a huge difference of opportunity cost in becoming entrepreneurs.

-          Most university student aim to get to work in a big multinational or for the government.

-          Most jobs don’t pay enough for young people to sustain themselves, so most young people live with their parents until late stage of their lives.

-          Families pressure their sons to follow a more stable career path.

-          There are not a lot of successful entrepreneurs stories to tell, or those who are successful have some kind of special background that most Brazilian don’t have (rich family support, family have money to send children abroad, etc.)

-          Universities in Brazil are followers or they don’t have great innovation in high growth industry such as internet.

-          Venture capital industry in Brazil is still in its infancy (Private Equity is much stronger in Brazil, GP Investimentos is the top firm in Brazil)

As you can see, these “soft” attributes cannot be accounted in any of the researches you have on the market. I believe they can make a significant difference in determine if a country or region will have its own Silicon Valley.

There is a news from the CNET that tells that Smartphones and low-cost handsets will keep dominating the wireless market. The post tells that despite the fact of economic downturn, demand for smartphone remained high and this category grew 27% compared to the same quarter a year ago. Also, smartphones have been the fastest growing segment of the mobile industry. Moreover, the prices for smartphones have been decreasing steadily in the last 5 years.

In my experience, smartphones were quite expensive. For instance, Palm Treo 700p was launched on 2005 and its price was around $650.00 with a two year contract. Now, you can get an iPhone with 8G with two year contract for about $99.00. I am not even counting the fact that we can do more things in the current generation of phones and we have more services than in the past.

Palm Treo 700p with two year contract around $650.00

From Gartner report from 2008, Market Share: Smartphones, Worldwide, 4Q08 and 2008, the Global sales of smartphones in 2008 reached 139.3 million devices, up 14% compared to 2007 . The smartphone market is definitely growing. It is expected that with the economic rebound, people will upgrade their mobile phones and they may buy more smartphone if the service costs and the phone become cheaper.

Looking at the Table 4, Worldwide: Smartphone Sales to End Users by Operating System, 2008 from Gartner, we can see that in spite of the 13.9 growth for the overall smartphone market, Research in Motion and Mac OS X grew really well with 96.7% and 245.7% respectively.

Smartphone market landscape 2007 - 2008

This type of growth is similar to what happened with the PC industry during the 80s and 90s.

As you can read these excerpts:

Chip makers post record results bolstered by booming PC sales

HOME COMPUTERS, 1994

PC Sales Over Holidays Rose 33% From '93 Level, 1994

Strong Gains For U.S. PC's, 1995

As you can see 1994 and beyond were the years when the PC industry had the greatest growth in history. The growth relied on the consumer market. While B2B has always been the initial driver of the PC industry, the B2C market was essential for the popularization of the personal computers.

Also, late in the 1997, the PC manufacturers started to sell PC in the sub-$1,000 category. This happened at the same time with the first big internet growth (Yahoo!, Amazon.com, etc.) and the high adoption of internet. In the following graph from ITU, the internet user’s rate grew 70% (the blue line from 97 and 98).

Internet users per 100 inhabitants 1997-2007

Also, the sales of PC grew immensely with the introduction of PC that cost less than $1,000.

Sub-$1,000 PC sales soar

As you can see from 25-Years PC Anniversary Statistics , the number of units of PC sold jumped from 5.7 million in 1981-1985 to 1,540 million in 2001-2006. That is a 27 times growth!

25-Year PC Anniversary Statistics

25-Year PC Anniversary Statistics Chart

Although, we do not have the power to see the future, there are some patterns from the PC industry that shows us that the smartphone industry will also have a spectacular growth. Definitely, there are differences, such as the number of operating systems and platform and also the fact that in the wireless industry, the manufactures and the carriers have a big say in the definition of the market, but undoubtedly, smartphone will growth.

And if the smartphone market grows as big as the PC industry, there will be a lot business opportunities and innovation.

After having to explain to my friends so many times about what a venture capital firm does, I created a simple and quick way to segment different kinds of VC firms.

Basically, we can classify venture capital firms with 3 criteria: industry target, fund’s size and preferred investment stage.

Most of the VC firms are specialized in a set of industries. Some firms are dedicated into internet startups such as Brightspark and some others that invest in proven general technology companies such as EdgeStone. Usually, VC firms specialize in specific sectors because they can build a strong knowledge of an industry and they can spot good opportunities and support portfolio firms easily.

Size of a fund is an important metric to classify VC firms. VC firms make money in two main ways: management fees and carried interests. The bigger the fund’s size, the bigger the reward for a VC firm. Also, for entrepreneurs, the fund’s size is a good indication of the amount of money the firm is able to invest. If an entrepreneur has a project that needs $10M, so an ideal VC firm would have a fund with over $100M (I will explain the rationale for this later in other posts).

Then, different firms have different investment strategy. Usually (though not a rule), small VC firms tend to invest in seed stage companies and bigger firms invest in growing and pre-IPO companies. If I were an internet entrepreneur and I don’t need that much money, I would go for a VC firms that specializes in seed stage internet company with a fund size under $ 100M.

This framework is important for entrepreneurs. Knowing how to differentiate VC firms can show readiness to a venture capitalist and you can easily explain why you are approaching that VC firm instead of the other.

I’m glad that I’m resuming my VC posts!

Happy Faces - I'm resuming my VC posts

Thanks Googlers!

Last Friday (July 17th) was my last at Google as a AdWords Product Specialist in Brazil. It was a fun, growing, interesting, deep, challenging and awesome experience.

As a Google fan, I was lucky enough to work in the product development, engineering, marketing, project management, education, training and sales sides of this great company. I was able to see the wholeness of how this behemoth company works and the more I knew the company, the more I admired Google.

Besides that, I admired Googlers the most. Googlers are extremely smart, intelligent and nice to work with. They do have a really high standards about any kind of work. That environment challenged me to do my best and to grow even more.

It was sad my last day, but I believe I will see my coworkers from Google someday again.

Now, I’m focus on my MBA in Canada.

Some of my Google experience left on the Internet:

Novos Recursos do Google Analytics (in Portuguese only)
Google University – AdWords Além da Busca? – SMX Sao Paulo
Google Developer Days 2007

Invest Now! - from Flickr

My last post from the Entrepreneurial Finance course is here.

Today, I want to share my summary of the Horizon Communications Corporation (A) case study.

This document basically shows the industry background of telecommunication in the 90′s. Basically, it highlights the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and how it changed the market.

With the Act, there was a new market opportunity for companies to provide transmission facility to customers. Basically, there was an opportunity for new companies to serve as a hub connecting a telecommunication facility for big clients to other local telecom providers and to long distance providers.

Along the case, it explains the who the founders are, what the Horizon’s operating strategy is and what the product and service are.

The case presents a serious of challenging questions to the Horizon’s management. It wants to students to think what amount of financing should they ask for and which venture capital firms they should approach.

Again, this case presents challenging questions for VCs and entrepreneurs.

Assignment from MIT OpenCourseWare:

Horizon Communications

1.Would you have started this company? Would you invest in this company? Why or why not? What do you think of the economics of the idea? Of the management team? How does this investment differ from that in Technical Data Corp.

2.What pre-money value would you place on the company? I.e., what value should the Horizon team place on the company when they try to raise money? How much money should they attempt to raise?

3.How should Horizon approach their fundraising process? Should Horizon go to a venture capital firm or to family and friends? If Horizon decides to go to a venture capital firm, which firm or firms should they target?

4.Can a venture capitalist add value to the Horizon team? How?

Assume:

. Horizon’s marginal tax rate is 36%
. Expected inflation is 3%.

Read the Case Study: Horizon Communications Corporation (A)

Please, add your answers in the comment section below!

Invest - from Flickr

I’ve started studying the Entrepreneurial Finance at MIT OpenCourseWare by myself a month ago. I wrote my first post about the first case study here (Technical Data Corporation Business Plan).

Until now, I think the selection of the case studies are awesome. It presents many cases where the student is put in the position of a venture capitalist and an entrepreneur. For instance, you have to learn how to valuate a business and decide if you want to invest in a specific company. Plus, you must provide your analysis to decide what you want to do next.

Today, I’m want to present my summary and my recommendations about the Centex Telemanagement, Inc. case study.

Centex Telemanagement, Inc.

- The case starts with the story of Sierra Ventures and its found Peter Wendell. Then, it talks about how Wendell met with Jeffrey Drazan. Drazan was a VC associate hired by Wendell. In this part of the case, it gave me a very interesting vision of how VC hires an associate to work with. Wendell wanted to invest in the telecommunication industry after the break-up of AT&T’s monopoly and he wanted to find a person with experience in telecommunication industry. Luckly, Drazan, who was in that industry, wanted to go to the VC industry. They had the chance to meet each other and the relationship developed.

- Later, it shows quickly the Centex Telemanagement formation, but the focus is how Drazan found and brought this opportunity to Wendell. Drazan worked with the Centex Telemanagement by acting as the CFO of the company. However, Centex and Sierra hadn’t formed any formal and legal relationship yet. Drazan was supporting the financial projections and planning the growth of the company. Everyone was expecting the Sierra would make an investment to Centex. When they were almost closing the details of the investment, the Sierra founders decided not to continue to the plan. Drazan was shocked because he dedicated an amount of effort to the company and it would ruined all his efforts. However, after some negotiation, they closed the deal in a staged/milestone-oriented approach to the deal.

- To get higher valuation, Centex would need to achieve some milestone, such as hiring the CEO and some other people in the senior management and also Centex would need to achieve an X amount of revenue by a deadline.

Assignment from MIT OpenCourseWare:

Centex Questions:

1. Sierra Ventures and Centex:

-Describe the deal structure:
-What role does Series C Preferred play?
-What value does right of first offer have?
-What valuation is Sierra offering to Centex? How can Sierra justify this valuation?

2. Private (initial) investors:

-How much dilution do the initial investors experience?
-How much dilution would the initial investors have experienced, if they had anti-dilution protection on their initial investment of $499,999? (Full ratchet? Weighted ratchet?)

Assume that by May 1985 the private placement offering has raised the full $499,999 for Centex at $2.25 per share

Read the Case Study: Centex Telemanagement, Inc. – 286059p2

Please, add your answers in the comment section!

A new study by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Right-Sizing the U.S. Venture Capital Industry, states that venture capital industry’s return is under performing because of the current size of the industry. It says that by reducing the it, this industry may increase its return.

The logic is that the VC firms won’t have that much money to make high valuations in startups, so the return will be higher naturally.

Kauffman says The US VC industry must shrink

This report is in tune with what I am reading from The Money of Invention, How Venture Capital Creates New Wealth: Paul A. Gompers, Josh Lerner. Josh Lerner’s book states clearly that if the supply of money from limited partner is high, while the demand of investment from startups is the same, the consequence is lower return.

This is incredible.

You can read more about the Kauffman’s paper here: http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/venture-capital-industry-must-shrink-to-be-an-economic-force-kauffman-foundation-study-finds.aspx

‘Super Angels’ Shake Up Venture Capital

Business Week has a great article about a type of angels investors called “super angels”. Although, the magazine didn’t state exactly in this way, super angels are high net worth individuals and small venture capital firms that invest around $ 1 million dollar in seed stage companies.

It illustrates the super angels with Josh Kopelman and his First Round Capital’s story.

The importance of this article is the visibility it gives to the venture capital industry and specially in this economic downturn.

I recommend reading it.

Read more here:

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_22/b4133044585602.htm

The Technical Data Corporation Business Plan is the first case study from the Entrepreneurial Finance course from MIT OpenCourseWare. It is a business plan prepared by Jeffrey P. Parker in late 1980.

The case describes that Technical Data wants to raise $100,000 before the end of 1980 in the form of 20 Units. Each Unit would have 50 shares of common stock offered at $10 per share and a promissory note (debt) of $4500.

Technical Data Corporation: Business Plan

You can read the case study here: http://utopia.duth.gr/~gk7844/moustakis/M1-2007-08/business_plan_example_1.pdf

Then, in this lecture, there are some questions regarding about this case from the open course. I answered them in bold.

Technical Data Corporation: Business Plan The case contains excerpts from a business plan prepared in late 1980.

The entrepreneur, Jeff Parker, proposes to start a company that will supply information to professional investors in the bond market. Among the issues you might address are the following:

1. Should Parker enter the business?

Parker is asking for $100,000 to start up the company. He will create a business based on an existing market of Telerate customer. If he secures, as he stated, the deal of promotion to Telerate’s customer, he is able to attract customer to his financial product and earn a stable source of revenue through the monthly subscription of the service. So, he should enter the business.

2. Would you invest in this deal?

He structure his deal in a promissory note and a few shares of his company. This type of structure is not ideal for a venture capitalist nor private equity partner. First, there is no incentive of high payoff in the $4500 from promissory note even if the interest rate is 15%. Second, the percentage of ownership is small, thus the active investors do not have a great say in the company. Lastly, the company’s grow depends on the Telerate customer base, so there is not a huge or exponential growth rate for the business in the future.

3. How has the deal been structured? Why? (Note that Parker is selling equity for 10% of the company in the units. The two directors with 1.5% each are buying 3 units each.)

The deal is structured in this way:

- 20 Unit
- Each unit having $ 5000 in value
- $ 5000 X 20 = $ 100,000

Each Unit:
- 50 shares of common stock at $ 10 / share
- promissory note of $4500

This is a great exercice. The next case I’m studying is the Horizon Communications Corporation (A), this one is much harder.

15.431 Entrepreneurial Finance

There is an amazing course for people seeking to work in the private equity, venture capital industry and entrepreneurship. The Entrepreneurial Finance is an open course that focus on the finance of start-up ventures.

It addresses some of the important questions such as:

- how much money can and should be raised
- when should it be raised and from whom
- what is a reasonable valuation of the company
- how funding should be structured.

I am self-studying this course and it is great to read case studies that make me aware of the issues that I will be facing in the VC/PE industry.

You can read more about this open course here: http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Sloan-School-of-Management/15-431Entrepreneurial-FinanceSpring2002/CourseHome/index.htm

Wow, this is increadible. 

Facebook is receiving $ 200 million for 1.96%!
 To calculate the post valuation, we just need to do this:

X = post-valuation
X = 200 million / 0.0196 = 10 204 million = $ 10 billion roughly.

Amazing how this company is able to draw more investment. 

Read more news about this event here:

Russian firm invests $200 mln in Facebook
What Is Facebook Actually Worth?
Why Facebook needs DST in Russia

DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050

BRIC is an acronym which means the fast growing developing economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China.

The BRIC concept was developed by Goldman Sachs’ Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050 article.

The article states that if these countries follow some of the recommended conditions for growth such as macro stability, institutions, openness and education, the BRIC countries will be better prepared to achieve economic hegemony in 2050.

The article says that in 2050, Brazil, Russia, India and China will become a larger force in the world economy. Goldman Sachs used the latest demographic projections, model of capital accumulation and productivity growth to map GDP growth for each of these countries. Some of the highlights:

- The BRICs economies together could be larger than the G6 in US dollar terms
- About two-thirds of the increase in US dollar GDP from the BRICs should come from higher real growth
-The key assumption underlying our projections is that the BRICs maintain policies and develop institutions that are supportive of growth
- Higher growth may lead to higher returns and increased demand for capital
- Rising incomes may also see these economies move through the ‘sweet spot’ of growth for different kinds of products, as local spending patterns change

Read more at: http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/brics/book/99-dreaming.pdf

Startups and Venture Capitalists Beware

I found an interesting post from Matt Eventoff (http://www.matteventoff.com) about how entrepreneurs should be careful of how to communicate to venture capitalists. 

He tell us that entrepreneurs should get a central message and practice the presentation. 

Basically, a lot of entrepreneurs do not get to the point of presentation. Usually, people present the potential of their products or how cool they are but they miss the main mission or objective of the presentation. In the case of an entrepreneur, he should pass the message getting funding, for example.

I personally agree the practice part. I usually practice 2 to 4 times my presentations about saying out loud to an imaginary crowd. I practice my voice, non-verbal clues and eye contact. The results are pretty good by the feedback I receive from Googlers.

Read Matt’s post about his communication tips here: http://www.matteventoff.com/venture-capital.html

Leslieville is home to an array of cafes and antiques stores.

Toronto is a very international and diverse city. It is one of the biggest city in Canada with 2.5 million of people (Greater Toronto has 5.6 million). 

I went there three times in my life and I have to say that it has its own big city charm with its Eaton Center and the Queen West District. Compared to other Canadian cities, it has a metropolitan vibe with its traffic and people rushing to schools, work and entertainment. 

It has a strong theater, music, painting and modern art scene. 

You should read the New York Times ‘36 Hours in Toronto‘ and follow its recommendation of how to visit this pretty city.  Also, visit my Google Maps that I created based on the article.

This is a rough view of the venture capital investment stages. These stages are for guidance only. In the real world, there is no standard in the classification of the investment stage. Sometimes, you can read number of rounds of investment. Other times, people will use the classification as stated below.

Angels investors

Angels investors are wealthy individuals who can invest in ranges from $50,000 to $1 million or more. They also provide expertise, experience and networking. They may perform the same roles as a venture capitalist.

News related to Angels investments

Getting Your Due
Angel investors commit less, but stay active in 2008
Houston tech startup wants to be all about you
Hoosier startups a bright spot in venture capital market

Seed stage

It is also a concept stage financing. The VC invests to allow the entrepreneur to spend on marketing research, patent application, incorporation, formation of the senior team and the company. Most VCs do not invest startups at this stage.

Funding value range around: US$ 100K to US$ 4 million (internet companies receive the least amount and the medical/green tech/energy companies receive the most)

News related to Seed investments

Burnaby startup finds inspiration in the sun
Automation Alley Invests $350K In Two Firms

Startup or Early Stage

In this stage, the entrepreneur already incorporated the business, but it has not yet started the commercial operation. Usually, it has the prototype or the final product developed.

Funding value range around: US$ 500K to US$ 5 million

News related to Startup investments 

Providence DNA research company receives $4 millioin
Tech new engine of Central Canada
Monica Healthcare, neonatal care startup, gets $1.6M
Investing dropoff hurting biotechs
Capital Factory Invests in Five Startups for 2009 Fund; Early Stage Technology Incubator in Austin, Texas AlsoRecognizes 5 Additional Finalist Startups
Prize CapitalTM Announces Due Diligence Phase for $10 Million Algae Fuel Prize 

First Stage or Round/Series 1/A or Formative Stage

Most startups in this stage already commercialize their products and have less than 3 years of existence. There is already a management team. Some companies have reached the breakeven point.

Funding value range around: over US$ 1 million (depending on the industry, the value can change drastically, the focus is on the company’s organization and the commercial stage)

News related to Series A investments 

Weekly Investor Round Up
Burnaby startup finds inspiration in the sun
AXIGEN Announces 2 Million EUR Investment
WebEx Founder Backs Chint Solar, Contributes to $50M Round
Energy Storage Rumors: Deeya Raises a Round; Bloom Piles Up Customers
Photovoltaic cell co B-Solar raises $3 million

Second stage or Round/Series 2/B

The startups at this stage already have a clear business model and they are already making some money. It has the management team and some employees. Usually, companies at this stage need capital to advance quickly the marketing and commercial efforts.

Funding value range around: over US$ 5 million (depending on the industry, the value can change drastically, the focus is on the company’s organization and the commercial stage)

News related to Series  B investments 

Auditsolutions is now Lavante, closes $5M in series B financing
May 2009 BUSINESS BRIEFS 
Microsoft: Restart or Logoff?
Turning Out The Lights: Ugobe, Maker Of Robotic Dinosaur
10-K/A: VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC

Third stage or Round/Series 3/C

If the company reaches this stage, it has a strong sales and customer base. Sometimes, it also has mid-level managers. The fund is used to increase more marketing, working capital, product development and expansion.

News related to Series  C investments 

Australia snares Silicon Valley wireless start-up

Mezzanine or Bridge or Expansion or Later stage

At this point, the company is going to IPO. The money is used to clean the balance sheet, remove debt and buy out any problematic investors or founders.

Initial Public Offering (IPO)

This is the checkpoint that all venture capitalists want to reach. The company’s shares are totally liquid. It means that they can sell the equity / shares they bought from the founders in the early stages of the company.

Some shootings in the British Game industry

In the Economist.com’s article “Play up, play up“, it shows the hardship the British game industry is suffering with lack of business and political support, meanwhile, it shows the growing strength of this industry in countries like Canada. In Canada, this industry receives foreign developers enjoy a five-year income-tax holiday, and firms get R&D allowances as well as subsidies for salaries. 

I searched a little bit the internet and I found out that Canada game industry is indeed very big (just behind Japan and United States).

14,000 people are now directly employed

247 Canadian video-game companies

Video-game sales at $2.09-billion, a 23% increase over 2007

Video games are predicted to account for 57% of all home entertainment sales in 2009

Electronic Arts Canadian offices showed more than 38 openings for high-paying positions

Some famous videos games developed in Canada:

Assassin’s Creed

Need for Speed: Underground 2

FIFA 09

Grand Theft Auto: Mission packs

A complete list of all video games create in Canada is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Video_games_developed_in_Canada

I remember that cities like Montreal and Vancouver are hubs in Canada for Game creation.

Also, I was thinking seriously of getting into this industry before landing a job in the biggest search engine on Earth.

David Seah is a functional designer creating very interesting calendar such as the Compact Calendar 2009. It allows you to make a big picture plan of what the most important days are and what you have to do on those days.

Official Compact Calendar Page

Check it out and create your on calendar now: http://davidseah.com/page/compact-calendar

Nice laptop backpack.